WASHINGTON, DC — If Marcel Duchamp was still alive, he probably would laugh over the public scorn heaped on Maurizio Cattelan’s duct-taped banana at Art Basel Miami Beach.
“Anything is art if an artist says it is,” Duchamp proclaimed. But he likely would have scoffed at the banana’s $120,000 price tag because he believed art was so commercialized “it has become one of the most trivial activities of our epoch.”
Duchamp’s legacy as the father of conceptual art and the readymade is on display in Marcel Duchamp: The Barbara and Aaron Levine Collection at the Hirshhorn Museum, featuring more than 35 works by Duchamp, including his readymades, paintings, and experiments in optical art. The Hirshhorn, which previously had only one work by Duchamp, now ranks near the Philadelphia Museum of Art and the Museum of Modern Art as holding the most prominent public collections of his work. The gift from the Levines also includes letters by Duchamp and portraits of him by Man Ray, Diane Arbus, and others.
Born in France in 1887, Duchamp’s career began in Paris but he eventually found a more receptive audience in New York, where he moved in 1915 to escape the devastation of World War I. Even though “Fountain” was refused by the newly formed Society of Independent Artists’ exhibition in 1917, a photo of the urinal by Alfred Stieglitz published in the journal The Blind Man helped cement Duchamp’s reputation as an iconoclast who brushed along the edges of several art movements without fully embracing any of them. An original copy of the journal is in the Hirshhorn exhibition, along with a collotype of his Cubist-inspired painting “Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2.” It was rejected by the tradition-bound organizers of the Salon des Indépendants exhibition in Paris in 1912 and was ridiculed a year later at the seminal Armory Show in New York. Those experiences planted the seeds of Duchamp’s distrust of the conservatism of the art world, from which he withdrew for a time to focus on his fascination with chess.
The Hirshhorn exhibition also includes 1960s editions of some of Duchamp’s readymades that were originally created five decades earlier, including “Comb” (“Peigne“) and “Hat Rack” (“Porte-chapeaux“). These later editions test the bounds of conceptual art. Is an edition (or addition) of eight hat racks that Duchamp deemed to be art in 1964 any different than the original hat rack from 1917? What if Duchamp opened a comb factory and proclaimed that thousands of combs were now art? When does conceptualism ultimately reach its absurd end point?
Maybe with a banana duct-taped to a wall.
Marcel Duchamp: The Barbara and Aaron Levine Collection continues at the Hirshhorn Museum (Independence Avenue and 7th Street, Washington DC) through October 15, 2020.
Curator La Tanya S. Autry shares a set of crucial questions she considers when curating images of anti-Black violence.
Crys Yin’s subject is grief, which, for all that takes place in public, is largely a private matter.
The first lecture is on the relationship between early portrait photography and diverse notions of US identity during the Gilded Age. Register to attend on January 25.
With her clay relief sculptures, Brie Ruais probes the exit wound and its deep psychological implications.
In Doomscrolling, Rob Swainston and Zorawar Sidhu assume the task Walter Benjamin set for the articulation of history — to “seize hold of the past as it flashes up at a moment of danger.”
Part of the university’s Artists on the Future series pairing renowned artists with cultural thought leaders, this online event is free and open to the public.
When we honor King publicly, as many in the art circle did on Monday, we use these moments to do more than just remember and pay tribute.
A study that reexamined Homo sapiens fossils found our species is 30,000 years older than previously believed.
As much as I appreciate the collective’s culture jamming initiatives, I don’t know that their putative premise ever bears meaningful fruit.
The banana’s dominance and ubiquity has had serious and far-reaching implications for the region, engendering exploitative labor systems, climate change, and migration.
Charles Dellheim’s study tells the tale of a small group of Jewish art dealers and collectors who played a key role in the changing art world of the 19th and 20th centuries.