The San Francisco Museum of Modern Art (SFMOMA) (Jeremy Thompson/Flickr)

SAN FRANCISCO — Gary Garrels has resigned as senior curator of painting and sculpture at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art (SFMOMA). His abrupt departure marks the latest and highest-profile leadership change at the Bay Area’s cardinal modern art institution, which is reckoning with what current and former workers call pronounced racism and structural inequities. 

The announcement on Saturday came less than 24 hours after a petition launched calling for his resignation, and less than a week after a staff meeting in which he stood behind controversial comments about collecting art by white men. “To say that we will not collect another white artist I absolutely do not agree with,” Garrels said at the meeting, calling it “reverse discrimination.”

Garrels, who was hired as SFMOMA’s senior curator in 2008, announced his resignation in an internal email acquired by Hyperallergic, offering apologies for his “extremely poor choice of words” while defending his record as a curator committed to racial diversity. “I realized almost as soon as I used the term ‘reverse discrimination’ that this is an offensive term,” he wrote.

Garrels also recounted the 1990s SFMOMA shows he worked on featuring artists of color, mentioning Glenn Ligon, Kara Walker, Kerry James Marshall, and Doris Salcedo, and the recent sale of a Mark Rothko painting to diversify the collection. “I firmly believe that is essential [sic] to collect works of art from artists of diverse backgrounds and from artists of all races,” he wrote. 

Sarah Roberts will take Garrels’s place as interim senior curator of painting and sculpture.

In a recording of the Tuesday meeting acquired by Hyperallergic, Garrels is asked to address remarks he made in January about assuring artists that SFMOMA “will continue to collect white men.” At Garrels’ mention of “reverse discrimination,” an unidentified meeting attendee interrupts to exclaim, “He did not just say that!” The moderators then work to bring the meeting to a close. 

On Thursday, SFMOMA director Neal Benezra and chief curator Janet Bishop called Garrels’s comments “inappropriate and understandably upsetting” in an internal note. “They are out of sync with the difficult and absolutely essential work that we are currently doing across the organization, and within the Curatorial Division, toward a more equitable museum,” it reads.

The petition sent out on Friday by xSFMOMA, a group of former SFMOMA staff pressuring the museum to address institutional racism and other structural inequities, calls Garrels’s ouster necessary: “Considering his lengthy tenure at this institution, we ask just how long have his toxic white supremacist beliefs regarding race and equity directed his position curating the content of the museum?” 

The homogeneity of SFMOMA’s collection on view partly stems from an agreement to reserve some 60 percent of galleries for predominantly works loaned by the Fisher family, whose fortune derives from the Gap and who’ve long held key roles on the museum’s board of trustees. The collection, spanning across three floors of the museum, skews heavily towards male European painters.

In a statement, xSFMOMA called on other museum leadership figures to “also recognize that their time is up and step aside to make space for those who are qualified to lead SFMOMA into an anti racist future.” xSFMOMA previously joined demands made by No Neutral Alliance, a coalition of Bay Area artists and art workers aiming to hold SFMOMA accountable for anti-Black racism, including for Benezra to resign as director. 

The xSFMOMA statement also called on Garrels to return a $500,000 no-interest home loan from the museum, a hiring perk that’s become a byword for lavish executive compensation (Benezra received a $800,000 loan), and for the money to support BIPOC employees. SFMOMA has undergone two rounds of layoffs since closing to the public in March.

Garrels did not respond to a comment request. SFMOMA is hiring for two new positions: a Director of Diversity, Inclusion and Belonging, and a Director of Employee Experience and Internal Communications. The museum sees this “as a key step towards ensuring a more diverse, equitable, and inclusive museum and staff experience,” a spokesperson said in a statement to Hyperallergic.

Garrels is the fifth high-level SFMOMA employee to step down in recent weeks. As Hyperallergic previously reported, Deputy Director of External Relations Nan Keeton resigned after defending a decision to censor Taylor Brandon, a Black former employee and No Neutral Alliance cofounder. Ann von Germeten is resigning as chief communications officer on July 20. The museum confirmed that the director of human resources, Marisa Robisch, and recruitment and staffing manager Cindi Hubbard are also leaving the museum at the end of July. 

Correction: A previous version of this article stated that Garrels was the fourth SFMOMA employee to resign. This is incorrect; Garrels was the fifth. We apologize for the error which has been amended. We have also updated the piece to include information on the additional staff member who stepped down.  

The Latest

Required Reading

This week, Godard’s anti-imperialism, in defense of “bad” curating, an inexplicable statue, criminalizing culture wars, and more.

Sam Lefebvre

Sam Lefebvre (@Lefebvre_Sam) is a freelance writer in Oakland whose journalism and criticism have appeared in publications including the Guardian, the New York Times, the Wire, Pitchfork, the Believer,...

6 replies on “Senior SFMOMA Curator Resigns Amid Reckoning With Institutional Racism”

  1. Gary Garrels did nothing wrong.

    But perceived ideological impurities must be ruthlessly expunged. He’s just another witch burned at the stake of political correctness.

    1. Exactly, he was speaking on topic. The pc culture wants blood. Fake outrage used as a form of passive aggression here to control the narrative. They actually accused him of “white supremacist” views, lol… I will say it here and now, this type of accusation has become a subtle and acceptable racial slur against white america in and of itself. It’s offensive and they don’t even care.

      Of course there can be reverse discrimination. The truth is,they don’t like that he said “we will continue to collect the work of white men”…

      As long as one is not honest with this crowd, you’ll do just fine, but the minute you begin to speak truthfully, or have a thoughtful opinion beyond this cultish thinking… it’s hasta luego baby!

  2. What kind of sick racists working at this museum were calling for art from all white men to be expunged from the galleries? And why would any sane person want to work for them?

  3. Garrels’ extraordinary life long commitment to contemporary artists of all races and genders is tossed aside after remarks based on history and scholarship. It would be absurd to say any museum could not collect the work of white men. This is another example of mob mentality and the museum should stand behind its dedicated curator. And director. Museums are not some Rotten Tomatoes site of thumbs up or down for the moment but constantly responding to complex forces in present but also future. This is appalling and threatening.

    1. Exactly. And it sounds as if no one at the museum responded to these ridiculous accusations in an adult manner.
      He will be missed.

Comments are closed.