Where have you seen that sculpture? Perhaps at an art fair, in one of hundreds of dizzying booths, or maybe featured in the glossy pages of a design magazine? The answer is neither, because none of the works pictured above are real. If the sculptures seem uncannily familiar, though, it’s because they are.
For his project “This Sculpture Doesn’t Exist,” artist Matteo Rattini trained a neural network — a set of algorithms designed to recognize patterns — to create images of contemporary sculptures based on Instagram’s suggestions. The resulting totemic structures, biomorphic forms, and sleek stacked shapes against drab gray backgrounds have a strange, mass-produced patina, as vaguely similar as Ikea furniture.
“The algorithm just accommodates users’ tastes, creating an artificial environment in which diversity is replaced by repetition and standardization,” Rattini told Hyperallergic. “While seeing images of a show you haven’t been to yet could spoil the experience, the algorithms and strategies employed by social media in content managing are working on a deeper level, changing and reshaping the perception of art itself.”
Rattini, who is currently studying multimedia arts at Università Iuav di Venezia, wanted to understand how Instagram’s algorithm was impacting his experience of art as well as his own practice.
“The way to discover it was to have the neural network exposed to the same quantity of images and information and see what it would produce,” he said.
The artist opened a new Instagram account, followed a few contemporary art profiles, and created a script that would automatically engage with the suggested posts — what he calls “biting into the algorithm recommendations baits.”
In the beginning, Instagram’s suggestions were wide and diverse. “But with time everything started to look the same,” Rattini said. “From pictures of paintings, installation, performances, it slowly reduced to pictures of minimal modernist sculptures showcased inside an aseptic white cube.”
The artist then fed about 4,000 photos of artworks into a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), a type of neural network made of two competing algorithms — a discriminator, which assesses the images in a dataset, and a generator, which produces random images. Based on the discriminator’s feedback, the generator slowly improves, yielding increasingly more realistic visuals.
“In a way, this mechanism reflects how our brain works, in a very simple way: you feed it a lot of information on trees, for example, and when it comes the time to draw a tree, not only is your idea of a tree informed by all the trees you’ve seen, but while you are drawing it, your brain is constantly judging it through your eyes and giving real-time feedback on how to compensate and adjust,” Rattini explained.
Indeed, the computer-generated sculptures became more and more convincing, evolving from blurry, amorphous blotches to clearly defined, structured, and realistic imitations of art. Any apparent diversity in form, texture, and color is flattened by a more pernicious sameness, an underlying monotony that is harder to pinpoint or describe.
The project helped Rattini visualize the otherwise imperceptible processes implemented by platforms like Instagram to tailor their users’ experiences, with the inevitable result of homogenizing the content they see — showing them artworks they are guaranteed to like, or, more dangerously, political views they already agree with.
“Every post you like, every image you share, every topic you show interest in, becomes data used to train the recommendation algorithms to better understand you, manipulate you, and predict what you’ll like and what will keep you online,” Rattini says.
Still, Rattini says he is not against social media; he just wants to get a better sense of how it operates, and more insight into how it might affect us.
“For me, it comes down to always remembering that the same tool that made me discover artists such as Rothko or Bacon could be altering my perception of art and my artistic production if not used consciously,” he said.
I won’t bother you with talk about how obscenely decadent and out of touch the Frieze art fair is. And yet…
Curators Tahnee Ahtone, La Tanya S. Autry, Frederica Simmons, Dan Cameron, and Jeremy Dennis offered the public a window into their curatorial processes through the work they produced during their fellowships.
Who says tragedy has to be tragic? Co-presented with National Black Theatre, this fresh, Pulitzer-winning take on a classic centers Black joy and liberation.
As part of Hyperallergic’s Emily Hall Tremaine Journalism Fellowship for Curators, Jeremy Dennis presents an exhibition to offer insight into his curatorial process.
As part of Hyperallergic’s Emily Hall Tremaine Journalism Fellowship for Curators, Dan Cameron presents an email exhibition to offer insight into his curatorial process.
For the triennial’s eighth edition, work by more than 70 artists is featured in 12 exhibitions and a polyphonic program, installed at various locations throughout the German city.
As part of Hyperallergic’s Emily Hall Tremaine Journalism Fellowship for Curators, Frederica Simmons presents an email exhibition to offer insight into their curatorial process.
As part of Hyperallergic’s Emily Hall Tremaine Journalism Fellowship for Curators, La Tanya S. Autry presents an exhibition to offer insight into her curatorial process.
This exhibition explores the work and short-but-impactful life of the groundbreaking ceramic artist. Now on view at the New Orleans Museum of Art.
As part of Hyperallergic’s Emily Hall Tremaine Journalism Fellowship for Curators, Tahnee Ahtone presents an email exhibition to offer insight into her curatorial process.
This week: Why does the internet hate Amber Heard? Will Congress recognize the Palestinian Nakba? And other urgent questions.
Artist Dan Jian makes the point that landscapes and memory are one and the same.