A new web-based project will slide art directly into your inbox once a month, with each iteration representing a digital solo show by a different artist for your own private viewing. SCREEN_, organized by artist Ada Wright Potter, launched this January and will continue to circulate works to its subscribers every last Friday of the month. It kicked off with the work of Jeffrey Scudder, who created a series of graphic prints he then integrated into a text-messaging layout to form a cryptic conversation between absurd characters. Scudder often works with digital art, but the forthcoming artists whom Potter invited — Dina Kelberman, Cecilia Salama, Cristine Brache, Vanessa Thill, Will Rahilly, and Lizzy DeVita — work in a variety of mediums, with the only uniting factor being that their work is meant for the screen. Rather than curating the emails, Potter provides the platform (MailChimp) for them to explore the possibilities and limitations of email art.
The project naturally considers and is informed by the history of mail art, which emerged in the 1950s and ’60s from the Fluxus movement. Email art itself isn’t a novel concept, with roots in the 1990s: Chuck Welch, for one, who was part of Ray Johnson’s New York Correspondence School, was exploring connections between physical mail and the internet in his project Telenetlink. Mail art has long been appreciated as an alternative way to view and distribute art without relying on a physical exhibition space and dealing with the regulated structures of the art world; Potter notes that these benefits are also relevant to email art, describing how SCREEN_ “allows us to circumvent the commercial art world, the institutional art world, the scene-y art world.”
Email is still an update to physical mail, of course, most obviously in cost and efficiency. The former was a huge appeal to Potter in the practical sense of avoiding financial charges attached to brick-and-mortar white spaces; the latter she values not just for the instantaneousness of email but also for its ability to rapidly provide additional context to an artwork that exists outside an inbox’s real estate.
“Email is less precious than mail,” she told Hyperallergic. “It’s also much, much faster. It can lead recipients down the web’s rabbit hole. Links and Google searches give instantaneous context. If you want to learn more it’s as simple as pulling up a new tab.”
What Potter considers precious, though, many mail artists would say are the gems that make mail art such a cherished method of communication. The physical aspects of delivering mail — from the stamps to their deliverymen — are part of the gesture even as they introduce inconvenience. Guy Bleus fondly describes these in his 1994 text, “Mail-Art: A Dialogue between the Postman and his Electronic Shadow” (in which he also declares electronics as “the guillotine of the mail (as a system of information),” writing that technology dehumanizes the ties between sender and recipient. Without such details, email art also changes the notion of place that is so vital to mail art; we have no idea from where emails are coming from, delivered with just an email address and a timestamp.
Still, our private inboxes are often very intimate spaces. As Potter noted, we are usually alone when we open our emails, creating a “private moment of immersion,” she said. “It’s a sort of a digital one-on-one.” While some may consider it less personal than mail art, the digital platform also introduces some hurdles, some restraints that challenge SCREEN_ artists’ creativity. Inboxes and web browser borders, for instance, create framing constraints, but so does MailChimp itself, which can sometimes be inflexible. The adoption of the newsletter generator was a deliberate one, as Potter has extensive experience formatting MailChimp emails for work but never had the chance to design one completely on her own terms.
“I thought it would be fun to mess with expectations and subvert slick PR style,” she said. Inviting artists to now hack the layout and override standards with their own codes, SCREEN_ plays with more than just one of our familiar modes of communication to insert bites of surprises into our daily routine.
What would it look like if museums turned their billions toward positive good instead of questionable investments simply for profit?
Patricio Guzmán combines reflection on the past, observation of the present, and hope for the future into an expansive vision of all the ideas he’s explored in his work.
Artists reflect on histories of oppressive power structures in Brazil in this exhibition at the Visual Arts Center at the University of Texas at Austin.
So closely do Disney’s animators assimilate the sensibility of French design that on occasion their source material appears almost more Disney than Disney itself.
The Grand Avenue Billboard Project enables artists like Karen Fiorito to publicly express their political views.
The museum opens to the public on October 8 with a 24-hour kickoff and a rebooted California Biennial.
The report estimates that 6.7 million Indigenous objects and human remains continue to be held in Canadian institutions, most of which do not have formal repatriation policies.
Funding options at UB include full-tuition scholarships for MFA students, the Arthur A. Schomburg Fellowship Program, and additional opportunities for MA students.
The Association of Art Museum Directors announced a shift in its longstanding policy, which restricted the use of funds from sales of art to new acquisitions only.
Martín Mobarak may have broken Mexican law, but he burned the proof.
Your list of must-see, fun, insightful, and very Los Angeles art events this month, including the Maya Codex of Mexico at the Getty, Beatrice Wood, Trenton Doyle Hancock, and more.