French criminologist Alphonse Bertillon believed each person’s physical measurements were as distinct as their fingerprints, and devised the first modern mug shots as part of his classification system in the 19th century. Using the still-new medium of photography, each person was captured both from the front and in profile. The idea was that the shape of the ears, the circumference of the head, and other such undisguisable characteristics could be used to identify criminals at a time when eyewitness reports still guided arrests.
Bertillon’s idea that every person had totally unique measurements is now mostly debunked (thanks in part to the case of two William Wests with nearly identical physical characteristics, aside from their fingerprints). Adding to the disregard of chance in his work, and the collapse of his reputation through his poor handwriting analysis that figured in the Dreyfus Affair, it was a convoluted system replaced in law enforcement by simpler fingerprinting. Bertillon’s system also reflected racist applications of eugenics and phrenology, and laid the groundwork for problematic profiling in the 20th century. Yet his mug shots endure as an intriguing form of early portraiture, and his crime scene photographs still startle through his inventive technique, which involved a camera positioned high on a tripod.
Bertillon is included in Crime Stories: Photography and Foul Play at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, which brings together some 70 works from the museum’s collections. The exhibition is a bit disjointed, presenting contemporary art like Andy Warhol’s overplayed “Electric Chair” and Larry Clark’s portrait of two swaggering Oklahoma robbers alongside graphic photographs from crime scenes. The most famous crime photographer, Weegee, is of course included, as is Alexander Gardner’s sequence on the hanging of the Lincoln assassination conspirators.
Crime Stories presents Bertillon as part of the visual culture of crime. It avoids any of the complicated profiling aspects of his work, such as his publishing of “les races sauvages [the savage races]” while he was considering his bertillonage system of anthropometry.
Crime Stories includes 60 of Bertillon’s “Mug Shots of Suspected Anarchists from French Police Files” from 1891 to 1895, a fascinating grid of late 19th-century Parisian faces, in which you can spy anarchist bomber Ravachol, whose 1892 arrest was facilitated by the photograph. There’s also an album of Bertillon’s Paris crime scene photography, open to a page showing a woman collapsed on a zigzag-patterned wood floor, the detached aerial view feeling like a film noir still. (The museum has the whole album digitized online, although be warned these are photographs of murders, and some are quite grotesque.)
Bertillon’s system was successful in some ways. Before his work, there was no easy way to identify repeat offenders, whereas with his system the photographs, and measurements of such things like the angles of a skull, provided a way to record serial criminals.
The Paris police started using his system in 1883. NPR’s All Things Considered, in their story on Bertillon, reports that in 1884 alone “Bertillon’s system helped Parisian police identify 241 repeat offenders.” In the following years, it was adopted across the United States and Great Britain.
Fingerprinting ultimately made Bertillon’s system obsolete, as it was a much easier process for the average police officer, and, oddly, was the one distinct physical attribute Bertillon overlooked. On his tombstone in Père Lachaise Cemetery, he’s still proudly immortalized in metal, examining his measuring tools, and the camera that proved to be his most enduring legacy. His systematic method of documentary photography is now an intriguing work of 19th-century portraiture, even if that was never his intent.
Crime Stories: Photography and Foul Play continues through July 31 at the Metropolitan Museum of Art (1000 Fifth Avenue, Upper East Side, Manhattan).
Art Problems: How Do I Get a Public Art Commission?
Want to leave a mark on your city or town, but don’t know where to start? Paddy Johnson has some tips.
Rose B. Simpson Embeds Ancestral Histories in Clay
She has taken clay and used it to recall its ancestral roots in Pueblo culture and address the present history of postcolonial recovery and ongoing trauma.
Mondays at Pratt Institute: Weekly Openings of Work by Graduating Artists
Free and open to the public, Pratt Shows celebrate the school’s graduating students. MFA and BFA work on view this spring in Brooklyn, New York.
Quiet Paintings at a Time of Sensory Overload
Where Kim Mikyung’s process suggests an obsessive burrowing into the self, Kim Hyung-dae casts his gaze upward and outward into the sky.
Is the “Free the Nipple” Movement Too White?
Online representations of the activists lean White and thin, creating an image problem for the movement.
LSU School of Art Grants Highest MFA Stipends in the Southern US
With funded assistantships, full tuition waivers, and generous stipends, Louisiana State University helps students lay the groundwork for a successful lifelong art practice.
New “We ❤️ NYC” Campaign Misses the Mark
The recently unveiled design is meant to live alongside the iconic original and specifically address the city, but New Yorkers are not happy.
1,000+ Objects at The Met Linked to Antiquities Smugglers
A report by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists revealed hundreds of works once owned by people accused of or convicted of antiquities crimes.
School of the Art Institute of Chicago Offers Summer Art and Design Courses Online and On-Campus
Emerging and established artists can choose from over 50 Adult Continuing Education courses at one of the most influential art and design schools in the US.
Lunar Bead Necklace and Asteroid “Emoji” Head to Auction
Christie’s bizarre sale features other space rocks propped up on stands like sculptures.
Scientists Create the First Full Brain Map of a Fly
The achievement is a giant step toward understanding human neural networks.
IDSVA Offers a Non-Studio PhD in Visual Arts: Philosophy, Aesthetics, and Art Theory
With no campus, the Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts is a truly nomadic institution, existing everywhere our students and faculty are.
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Closes Over Climate Protest
The institution shuttered in advance of an action planned for the 33rd anniversary of its infamous art heist.
Remembering the Migrants Who Died in US Detention
Artist Jackie Amézquita will lead a caravan of trucks with the names of the deceased to LA sites representing systems of oppression and solidarity for immigrants.
Uh, not sure why you say these ideas are debunked. That’s how facial recognition works. That’s how airports let you through by comparing your passport to your face. They use things like the distance between your eyes and other ratios they can extract from your face. If anything the man was ahead of his time.
Perhaps debunked isn’t the right word, but the idea of human measuring is no longer seen as totally distinct: “In 1903, a man named Will West was committed to the penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas, where he was photographed and measured using the Bertillon system. Will West’s measurements were found to be almost identical to a criminal at the same penitentiary named William West, who was committed for murder in 1901 and was serving a life sentence. Furthermore, their photographs showed that the two men bore a close physical resemblance to one another, although it was not clear that they were even related. In the ensuing confusion surrounding the true identities of the two men, their fingerprints conclusively identified them and demonstrated clearly that the adoption of a fingerprint identification system was more reliable than the older Bertillon system.” http://www.nleomf.org/museum/news/newsletters/online-insider/november-2011/bertillon-system-criminal-identification.html?referrer=https://www.google.com/
That’s simply a case of not having enough parameters, or not having accurate enough measurements of the parameters that they did have. Fingerprints aren’t foolproof either, even DNA isn’t foolproof when the machines are used past their operating ranges (see Knox case in Italy). Every biometric is a matter of getting enough bits of distinction to make non-uniqueness extremely improbable. If Bertillon’s theory was that physical measurements can be as unique as fingerprints, then it’s a fundamentally correct insight.
Well, we will have to disagree. I can cite examples and perhaps I didn’t explain it clearly in this article. Here is more:
“I based my claim that Bertillonage was thoroughly debunked on two factors: (1) that the practice suffered from what is known in statistics as “endogeneity;” and (2) that it’s no longer used anywhere. Endogeneity is a relatively simple problem: you may underestimate the likelihood of two “chance” occurrences happening together if they are, in fact, correlated. The chance of any given person being a Stanford alumnus is relatively small; and the chances of any given person owning a red T-shirt may also be small, but the number of Stanford alumni who own red T-shirts may be much higher than “chance”: Stanford’s official school color, as emblazoned on many T-shirts, is cardinal.”
Comments are closed.