Alice Miceli photographed the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone in Ukraine between 2006 and 2010, 20 years after the area’s famous nuclear reactor explosion. She didn’t focus on the buildings reduced to cracker crumbs, the rusted and abandoned ferris wheels, or other stops on what’s becoming a disaster tourism destination, especially after the release of the eponymous HBO series. Miceli was there instead to capture an invisible villain, the gamma rays that lingered from the explosion — dangerous, even fatal, but invisible to the naked eye and traditional photography. Instead, she used radiographic film, typically for X-rays, to make the gamma rays visible.
Projeto Chernobyl, a selection of 30 radiographs now on view at The Americas Society, is the result of this experiment. Before visiting, I wondered whether seeing the gamma rays alone would have the emotional weight of depictions of the destruction they caused. Was Miceli akin to an X-ray tech for environmental disaster, assessing damage regular cameras couldn’t penetrate?
Visitors hoping for more information about Chernobyl itself might be disappointed, but fortunately the radiographs work very well as artworks on their own. Visitors enter through a room containing a short film and wall text explaining Miceli’s process. Together, they provide just enough information to elucidate what’s on view. Past a black curtain is a dark hallway lined on both sides by radiographs, whose backlit glow is not much stronger than the average candle, which gives the room a haunted quality. Although limited to gray-scale the radiographs are remarkably expressive.
The lack of a conventional focal point or frame means there’s a lot happening all over, which in other artwork might be distracting or even frustrating to a viewer yearning for compositional direction or grounding; “fragment of a roof I – 3.168 µSv (17.11.08 – 21.01.09)” looks like scattered stars in the night sky. My favorite of the pictures, “fragment of a field V – 9.120 µSv (07.05.09 – 21.07.09),” on the middle wall of the back room, includes what looks like cupped hands at the right edge of the frame.
In “fragment of a wooden wall III – 2.236 µSv (21.01.09 – 07.04.09),” the rays look like the graffiti tags scratched into the windows of subway cars. The thick, truncated gray-and-white lines in “fragment of a field III – 9.120 µSv (07.05.09 – 21.07.09)” are almost fluffy, resembling the tousled fur of a dog after someone has pet it more than the field of grass or wheat that is likely depicted.
The marks in “fragment of a field I – 9.888 µSv (07.08.08 – 17.11.08)” resemble blood vessels — thin black lines are scratched into tree-like patterns against a gray field — while “fragment of a field VIII – 5.908 µSv (17.11.08 – 21.01.09),” stacked with blocks of gray and white, evokes Mark Rothko, if he had veered from his reds and oranges.
Even when it’s not being used for human X-rays, radiographic images can start to resemble body parts and bones. Much like an extended visit with Rorschach blocks, the more I looked at them, the more I could see objects or people in the abstraction. On the right wall of the first room, in “fragment of the trunk of a tree I – 6.920 µSv (17.11.08 – 21.01.09),” I thought I saw the circular outlines of ribs. Across the room, I decided “fragment of a field VI – 9.120 µSv (07.05.09 – 21.07.09)” was a cheetah or a leopard. I made out close-set eyes, a black, round nose, and whiskers.
In the best circumstances, X-rays offer clarity, a diagnosis, a path to action. In the worst cases, they reveal danger, or they are frustratingly inconclusive. However, Miceli isn’t diagnosing our ailments. For anyone expecting this exhibition to reveal deeper truths about Chernobyl or nuclear explosions, Projeto Chernobyl might feel like a letdown. But if you’re willing to view the radiographs on their own terms, to see radiography as both a practical tool and a potential art form, you’ll be richly rewarded.
Alice Miceli: Projeto Chernobyl continues at the Americas Society (680 Park Avenue, Manhattan) through January 25, 2020. The exhibition was curated by Gabriela Rangel and Diana Flatto.
I won’t bother you with talk about how obscenely decadent and out of touch the Frieze art fair is. And yet…
Curators Tahnee Ahtone, La Tanya S. Autry, Frederica Simmons, Dan Cameron, and Jeremy Dennis offered the public a window into their curatorial processes through the work they produced during their fellowships.
Who says tragedy has to be tragic? Co-presented with National Black Theatre, this fresh, Pulitzer-winning take on a classic centers Black joy and liberation.
As part of Hyperallergic’s Emily Hall Tremaine Journalism Fellowship for Curators, Jeremy Dennis presents an exhibition to offer insight into his curatorial process.
As part of Hyperallergic’s Emily Hall Tremaine Journalism Fellowship for Curators, Dan Cameron presents an email exhibition to offer insight into his curatorial process.
For the triennial’s eighth edition, work by more than 70 artists is featured in 12 exhibitions and a polyphonic program, installed at various locations throughout the German city.
As part of Hyperallergic’s Emily Hall Tremaine Journalism Fellowship for Curators, Frederica Simmons presents an email exhibition to offer insight into their curatorial process.
As part of Hyperallergic’s Emily Hall Tremaine Journalism Fellowship for Curators, La Tanya S. Autry presents an exhibition to offer insight into her curatorial process.
This exhibition explores the work and short-but-impactful life of the groundbreaking ceramic artist. Now on view at the New Orleans Museum of Art.
As part of Hyperallergic’s Emily Hall Tremaine Journalism Fellowship for Curators, Tahnee Ahtone presents an email exhibition to offer insight into her curatorial process.
This week: Why does the internet hate Amber Heard? Will Congress recognize the Palestinian Nakba? And other urgent questions.
Artist Dan Jian makes the point that landscapes and memory are one and the same.