- Danh Vo’s objects are unremarkable without history. We can debate until Miami freezes about over the place of artworks that don’t do much visually, that make references so opaque you have to a) be a specialist or b) have the work explained to you by an outside aid. Vo’s challenges to our assumptions about art are as frustrating as they are exciting.
Vo has beautiful ideas, to be sure. For an exhibition at the Renaissance Society, he bought and displayed Henry Kissinger’s letters profusely thanking columnist Leonard Lyons for ballet tickets. They are unremarkable until you notice the dates: the years Kissinger was masterminding the brutal wars in Vietnam and Cambodia. For “2.2.1861,” Vo asked his father to copy the letters of a French missionary to Vietnam who was executed for his work; his father, who does not speak French, applied his meticulous lettering to words he didn’t understand. Vo blends the lines between artist and curator and collector; he believes in the gravity of objects and the power of recontextualizing them.
For “We the People (Detail),” Vo acts more like an artist. He had full-size copper replicas of the 400 pieces that make up the Statue of Liberty recreated but never assembled. Instead, groups of the segments are displayed in art institutions around the world — hence the “(Detail).” Some of the pieces are more obviously Lady Liberty than others, but all hold aesthetic appeal: the fragility of the copper shells, the atmosphere of monumental ruin.
With over a dozen institutions showing the work, inclusion in the New Museum Triennial and the Shanghai Biennale, a recent New York Times article devoted to the piece, and Vo’s recent receipt of the Guggenheim’s Hugo Boss prize, “We the People (Detail)” can be safely judged a success.
Smartly, Vo never says what the work is “about.” But by choosing an image as potent as the Statue of Liberty, he doesn’t have to. For starters, the project conjures the global reach of US imperialism, or perhaps the decline of it. He has created an American Ozymandias, a once mighty statue now unrecognizable. Each set of Liberty’s shards becomes a synecdoche for an object that itself stands for a larger idea.
If the statue’s inherent meanings were not weighty enough, the replica was made in China. Knowing this, the geopolitical readings run riot. It’s possible that Vo meant this as a statement on China-US relations, but it’s also hard to imagine this project without the factories and inexpensive labor of China.
Which points to the most intriguing aspect of “We the People (Detail)”: the system of the global art world becomes part of the project’s substance. Curators and the institutions that support them are happy to pack and crate these huge husks around the world. Shipping lines, institutional partnerships, and the buzz of excitement around Vo are inseparable from the work’s meaning, which is shaped by its various contexts. This art world complex, of course, reflects the global reach and colonial structures of wealthy nations.
A few months ago, Damien Hirst challenged viewers to visit Gagosian’s eleven worldwide galleries, all simultaneously exhibiting his dot paintings. It was a simple idea with a lot of money behind it: the sameness of Hirst’s mass-produced, repetitive dots, the fun of seeing it all because you can. Whether “We the People (Detail)” reinforces or critiques this global art system remains more ambiguous. While the Hirst project turned Gagosian’s international reach into a gimmick, the scattering of “We the People” was built into its conception.
In New York disaster movies, the Statue of Liberty is a popular, almost necessary target. It is snowed over in The Day After Tomorrow, decapitated in Cloverfield and Escape from New York (see Wikipedia for a full tally of destruction). In Planet of the Apes, its ruins signal the defeat of humanity. This is the beauty of the statue: it remains just as powerful when destroyed as whole.
Never having had a king or helmsman, Lady Liberty is the closest thing we Americans have to a body politic. It’s not surprising, then, that museums and collectors are so attached to it. “We the People (Detail)” is a timely project for an era when America’s global dominance is matched by its doubts about maintaining it. Vo turned his knack for collecting into creating the collector’s want: dispersed like this, the fragments resemble nothing as much as souvenirs, reminders of a country and concept passing into twilight.
Moving too fast on your commute, looking out of the corner of your eye one second too late, and you might miss HOTTEA’s yarn installations.
Peruvian history is a contentious subject, and the authorities in charge of writing its first drafts should not be taken at their word.
Presented by Northwestern’s Block Museum and McCormick School of Engineering, this new exhibition seeks empathy at the boundaries of life. On view in Evanston, Illinois.
A little detail in an artwork can reveal that sometimes what is right on the surface can change our understanding of the whole.
Oh Shit! retraces the historical arc of feces from ancient Rome to the sewage challenges and potential innovations of the 21st century.
Located in Des Moines, Iowa, this residency for emerging and established artists includes studio and living space, a $1,000 monthly stipend, and more.
The controversial technology determined that the so-called de Brécy Tondo is an original by the Italian Renaissance master.
Specialists inflated the protest artwork as part of conservation testing at the Museum of London.
Fully-funded teaching assistantships are standard for MFA students at the top-ranked, flagship research university in the state of New York.
Some museums are opting for new language to describe the preserved individuals in their collections who were once living humans.
As art history buffs on the app have pointed out, both movements attribute meaning to the meaningless.