This story of a cunning artist and an unsuspecting museum will make you rethink what conceptual art can get you. The Kunsten Museum of Modern Art in Aalborg, Denmark, lent the artist Jens Haaning 534,000 kroner (~$84,000) to reproduce two of his older artworks. But what did he do instead? He kept the money to himself and renamed the series Take the Money and Run.
According to a written agreement between the two sides, Haaning was expected to utilize the banknotes from the payment to recreate two pieces he made in 2007 and 2010. The original artworks represented the respective average annual incomes of Austrians and Danes using cash bills. But for his latest, Haaning delivered two empty frames, with no banknotes to be seen.
“The work is that I have taken their money,” Haaning explained in an interview with the Danish radio program P1 Morgen. “It’s not theft. It is a breach of contract, and breach of contract is part of the work.”
Is it mere provocation or an act of protest against the work conditions of artists? According to Haaning, it’s both. The artist claimed that the stunt was in reaction to the low fees offered to him by the museum. Completing the works would’ve required him to pay an extra 25,000 kroner (~$3,900) out-of-pocket, he argued. Showing no remorse, Haaning said that he has no intention to return the money.
“I encourage other people who have just as miserable working conditions as me to do the same,” he told the Danish radio show. “If they are sitting on some shit job and not getting money and are actually being asked to give money to go to work, then take the box and [run] off.”
The museum seems to be enjoying the publicity, at least for now. Haaning’s empty frames were included in the exhibition Work it Out, which examines the labor market and the working conditions of artists. However, the museum is planning to claim the loan back when the exhibition ends in January.
“It wasn’t what we had agreed on in the contract, but we got new and interesting art,” Kunsten’s director Lasse Andersson told Hyperallergic in an email.
When asked if the museum would consider taking legal action against Haaning, Andersson replied: “Right now we’ll wait and see. If the money is not returned on 16 January as agreed, we will of course take the necessary steps to ensure that Jens Haaning complies with his contract.”
Although Khedoori does not depict living beings, their presence is evoked in the traces they leave behind.
The Bronx Museum’s fifth biennial continues to focus its programming on individual identity, eliding the ever-divergent interests of the art market and local communities.
Part of the university’s Artists on the Future series pairing renowned artists with cultural thought leaders, this online event is free and open to the public.
While it may be strange to think of food insecurity as a basis for art, the works in Food Justice reveal barriers and injustices in food access.
Shiv would definitely have a Chihuly chandelier.
“[The art market] provides an opportunity for people to move money in a way that they can’t with other commodities,” says FBI Special Agent Chris McKeogh.
Black American Portraits features over two centuries of artworks centering Black artists and subjects.
Weisman Museum of Art Presents Highlights From the Kinsey African American Art and History Collection
An exhibition at Pepperdine University in Malibu chronicles the achievements and contributions of African Americans over the last five centuries.
A love of Black art and history was the bedrock of the friendship between Dell Marie Hamilton and Susan Denker, who had markedly different racial, economic, and generational subject positions.
With what he says is his final museum bow, Fitzpatrick shines a light on the colorful diversity that composes his city.
The question of race — however hidden, however camouflaged by the shouts of the crowds — is a constant theme and an unanswered challenge.