I was intrigued, surprised, and, most of all, thoroughly convinced by Pete Schulte’s first exhibition at McKenzie Fine Art, Properties of Dust and Smoke, pt. 2 (October 30–December 21, 2019). Working with graphite and occasional traces of muted color, Schulte’s 37 drawings in the exhibition ranged from 6 by 6 inches to an eccentric format of 2 by 90 inches. The vocabulary encompassed geometric shapes, rounded organic forms, architectural motifs, and arcane signs. Compositionally, the works went from flat, anti-illusionistic surfaces to elusive illusionistic spaces. Looking closely, the viewer is likely to recognize a quirky amalgamation of the affections, ranging from Constantin Brâncuși and Brice Marden to Emma Kunz and Paul Feeley, from reductive modular forms to bulbous Pop allusions, and from Suprematism to cartoons.
I like that Schulte combined seemingly incommensurable motifs derived from reductive geometric abstraction or decorative architectural details, that he could be self-contained or referential or both in the same drawing. I like the way that in some drawings a faint cloud of graphite dust had spread beyond the drawn form, like an exhalation. I like the way that each drawing pulls you closer and invites you to slow down your looking and contemplate carefully arranged accumulations of black and gray dust, to notice the shift in the density of the form and the pressure of the hand, to be open to contrast and tonal shifts, and the granular surface of a worked form.
Committing yourself to work on a drawing that is taller than you and perhaps your reach is a challenge that few artists take up, but to limit that same drawing’s width to two inches requires a highly focused attention, particularly if you proceed by shape and do not rely on gesture to help you move across the drawing. It is the kind of attention that places Schulte in the same company as Piet Mondrian, Myron Stout, Susan York, James Siena, Catherine Murphy, Dawn Clements, Harry Roseman, and Vija Celmins.
This is why I went to the exhibition Pete Schulte: The Train and the River, at McKenzie Fine Art (October 29-December 19, 2021). The synthesis of rigor and quirkiness was most apparent in the wall sculpture “Slow Train (Braid VIII)” (2021), which is composed of a pair of overlapping turtle shells the artist has cast into unsealed bronze.
Schulte repeats the pair of turtle shells vertically until they become a column on the wall. (The larger shell appears to be humping the smaller one emerging from beneath it.) Running down the length of the shiny bronze is a repeated white, vertebrae-like shape the artist has painted. As the title suggests, “Slow Train (Braid VIII)” evokes a train moving across a flat landscape and a braid of hair.
“Slow Train (Braid VIII)” is also a picture of a spine that has been painted on a spine-like arrangement of two joined turtle shells. It doesn’t feel like he set out to make this work, but rather that he discovered it was possible. It is not an expression of will, but of being open to the world and the things you encounter.
This is what I mean when I say that Schulte merges severity and eccentricity in a single work and arrives at something uncanny. One of the pleasures of his objects and drawings is that they simultaneously invite and resist interpretation. The best ones are mysterious and materially sensual. In them, we see Schulte’s sensitivity to light, which is usually hushed, diffuse, and on the brink of fading away.
Swollen, tongue-like forms; narrow, straight bands drawn horizontally and vertically; inverted triangles; wavy bands; and ellipses are just some of the elements in Schulte’s visual vocabulary. He uses graphite, ink, and pigment. At times the drawings work by contrast (black and white), at other times by tone (different intensities of black and gray, with white and perhaps a toned sheet of paper). Solid and transparent forms abut and overlap each other, like shoppers at a Christmas sale.
Schulte’s forms remind me of columns, veils, windows, archaic signs, elongated bubbles (like those in a lava lamp or a cartoon), and heraldic emblems. The oddness of works such as “Slow Train (Braid VIII)” and the tall, narrow drawings that he had in both his first New York exhibition and this one bespeak an artist pursuing his own trajectory, making drawings that transform the rhythmic repetition of the Blues (he lives in Alabama), love of Brâncuși’s modular forms, and desire for elevation into the ether, into something all his own. While he has developed a slowly expanding storehouse of shapes and signs, as well as oscillated between abstraction and figuration, purity and allusion, he has not developed a signature style. He seems at once focused and restless, determined and open.
It is a radical act to make drawing an integral part of your daily practice. I thought about this when the pandemic became official in March 2020 and the lockdown began. Which artists would continue to make work without interruption because they did not rely on studio assistants and fabricators, and were not dependent on the labor of others to make their work? Which artists are truly autonomous in that regard and do not survive on the work of others? One artist is Pete Schulte, whose second show is not to be missed.
Pete Schulte: The Train and the River continues at McKenzie Fine Art (55 Orchard Street, Manhattan) through December 19.
MTV’s The Exhibit Is Finally Spicing Up
In the penultimate episode, the show’s editors managed to ignite the spark of mindless reality TV.
Guggenheim Museum Union Rallies at VIP Opening
The museum’s commitment to diversity in exhibitions rings hollow to workers who say they are not receiving a fair wage.
The Public Theater Explores the Hurricane Katrina Diaspora in shadow/land
Written by Erika Dickerson-Despenza and directed by Candis C. Jones, this lyrical meditation on legacy, erotic fugitivity, and self-determination is on view in NYC.
Quieter Artworks Stand Out At a New York Photo Fair
At this year’s Association of International Photography Art Dealers show, the best works offer glimpses into the personal lives of photographers and their subjects.
Special Edition: 🖌️Artists’ Signatures ✍️
In this special edition, we investigate what artists’ signatures actually mean, and the fascinating results reveal the multifaceted history of this curious phenomenon.
The Rubin Museum Presents Death Is Not the End
Tibetan Buddhist and Christian works of art made across 12 centuries explore death, the afterlife, and the desire to continue to exist. On view in NYC.
What Is a Signature in the Internet Age?
As a cryptographic unit for record-keeping, an NFT can be seen as analogous to a signature or an autograph.
The Meaning of Ancient Greek and Roman Artisan Signatures
What did a signature mean in the ancient world, and how much can we trust what they seem to tell us?
When I Am Empty Please Dispose of Me Properly
Ayanna Dozier, Ilana Harris-Babou, Meena Hasan, Lucia Hierro, Catherine Opie, Chuck Ramirez, and Pacifico Silano explore the myths of the American Dream at Brooklyn’s BRIC House.
Michelangelo’s Signature and the Myth of Genius
Michelangelo served as a stellar example for future artists who sought status and economic independence.
Uncovering the Photographer Behind Arshile Gorky’s Most Famous Painting
As we pursue photographer Hovhannes Avedaghayan a fascinating picture begins to emerge of him and the world of which he was part.
Pratt’s 2023 Fine Arts MFA Thesis Exhibition Is On View in Brooklyn
The two-part exhibition features the work of 41 graduating artists across disciplines, including painting, sculpture, printmaking, and integrated practices.
100 Years of Artist Signatures in a Detroit Club
The beams in Detroit’s Scarab Club act as a guest book of sorts, carrying a wealth of stories and history, including signatures by Diego Rivera, Marcel Duchamp, Margaret Bourke-White, Isamu Noguchi, and others.
The Myth of Agency Around Artists’ Signatures
In an art world built on shifting sands, artists’ signatures become symbols of agency for some, and relics of the past for others.